PJK:jld:jf
2005 - 2006 LEGISLATURE
June 28, 2005 - Introduced by Representatives Vos, Nass, LeMahieu, J.
Fitzgerald, Lehman, McCormick, Strachota, Sheridan, Ballweg, Gronemus,
Musser, Nischke, Ainsworth and Hahn, cosponsored by Senators Stepp,
Grothman and Darling. Referred to Committee on Family Law.
AB531,1,4
1An Act to renumber and amend 767.327 (5m);
to amend 767.24 (1m) (L); and
2to create 767.001 (1g), 767.23 (1) (ap), 767.24 (1m) (Lm), 767.24 (4) (e) and
3767.327 (5m) (b) of the statutes;
relating to: granting a parent electronic
4communication with a child.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau
Under current law, in a divorce or legal separation in which a minor child is
involved, and in a paternity action, the court must grant sole legal custody of the
child to one parent or joint legal custody to both parents together. In addition, the
court must allocate between the parents periods of physical placement, which is the
condition under which the child is physically placed with the parent and the parent
has the right and responsibility during that time to care for, and make routine daily
decisions concerning, the child. The court may deny a parent periods of physical
placement with the child only if being physically placed with the parent would
endanger the child's physical, mental, or emotional health.
This bill provides that, if the court grants periods of physical placement to both
parents, the court may grant to a parent a reasonable amount of electronic
communication at reasonable hours during the other parent's periods of physical
placement with the child. Electronic communication is defined as time during which
a parent and his or her child communicate by using various types of communication
tools, such as the telephone, electronic mail, instant messaging, and video
conferencing or other wired or wireless technologies via the Internet. The basis for
granting electronic communication is whether it is in the child's best interest and
whether equipment for providing electronic communication is reasonably available
to both parents. Electronic communication may be used only to supplement, and not
as a substitute or replacement for, the physical placement that a parent has with the
child.
The bill provides that a parenting plan that a party files with the court before
a pretrial conference when legal custody or physical placement is contested must
include any electronic communication a parent is requesting and must indicate
whether equipment for providing electronic communication is reasonably available
to both parents. The bill also provides that, if a parent is proposing to move with the
child and the other parent objects to the move, the court may not use the availability
of electronic communication as a factor in support of a modification of physical
placement or a refusal to prohibit the parent from moving with the child.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB531, s. 1
1Section
1. 767.001 (1g) of the statutes is created to read:
AB531,2,52
767.001
(1g) "Electronic communication" means time during which a parent
3and his or her child communicate by using communication tools such as the
4telephone, electronic mail, instant messaging, video conferencing or other wired or
5wireless technologies via the Internet, or another medium of communication.
AB531, s. 2
6Section
2. 767.23 (1) (ap) of the statutes is created to read:
AB531,2,117
767.23
(1) (ap) Upon the request of a party, granting periods of electronic
8communication to a party in a manner consistent with s. 767.24. The court or circuit
9court commissioner shall make a determination under this paragraph within 30
10days after the request for a temporary order regarding periods of electronic
11communication is filed.
AB531, s. 3
12Section
3. 767.24 (1m) (L) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB531,2,1513
767.24
(1m) (L) Whether and how the child will be able to contact the other
14parent when the child has physical placement with the parent providing the
15parenting plan
, and what electronic communication, if any, the parent is seeking.
AB531, s. 4
1Section
4. 767.24 (1m) (Lm) of the statutes is created to read:
AB531,3,32
767.24
(1m) (Lm) Whether equipment for providing electronic communication
3is reasonably available to both parents.
AB531, s. 5
4Section
5. 767.24 (4) (e) of the statutes is created to read:
AB531,3,155
767.24
(4) (e) If the court grants periods of physical placement to more than one
6parent, the court may grant to either or both parents a reasonable amount of
7electronic communication at reasonable hours during the other parent's periods of
8physical placement with the child. Electronic communication with the child may be
9used only to supplement a parent's periods of physical placement with the child.
10Electronic communication may not be used as a replacement or as a substitute for
11a parent's periods of physical placement with the child. Granting a parent electronic
12communication with the child during the other parent's periods of physical
13placement shall be based on whether it is in the child's best interest and whether
14equipment for providing electronic communication is reasonably available to both
15parents.
AB531, s. 6
16Section
6. 767.327 (5m) of the statutes is renumbered 767.327 (5m) (intro.)
17and amended to read:
AB531,3,1918
767.327
(5m) Discretionary
Other factors to consider. (intro.) In making
19a determination under sub. (3)
, the:
AB531,3,21
20(a) The court may consider the child's adjustment to the home, school, religion
21and community.
AB531, s. 7
22Section
7. 767.327 (5m) (b) of the statutes is created to read:
AB531,3,2523
767.327
(5m) (b) The court may not use the availability of electronic
24communication as a factor in support of a modification of a physical placement order
25or in support of a refusal to prohibit a move.
AB531,4,42
(1)
Parenting plans. The treatment of section 767.24 (1m) (Lm) of the statutes
3first applies to parenting plans filed with the court on the effective date of this
4subsection.